Poll: Is The Fraud Act 2006 Fit for Purpose
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Keep the Act I'm Happy
0%
0 0%
Abolish the Act It's Bullshit
100.00%
1 100.00%
Total 1 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2006 Fraud Act - Section 2
#1
2 Fraud by false representation

(1)A person is in breach of this section if he—

(a)dishonestly makes a false representation, and

(b)intends, by making the representation—

(i)to make a gain for himself or another, or

(ii)to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

2)A representation is false if—

(a)it is untrue or misleading, and

(b)the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.

(3)“Representation” means any representation as to fact or law, including a representation as to the state of mind of—

(a)the person making the representation, or

(b)any other person.

(4)A representation may be express or implied.

(5)For the purposes of this section a representation may be regarded as made if it (or anything implying it) is submitted in any form to any system or device designed to receive, convey or respond to communications (with or without human intervention).
Reply

#2
Not very well thought out just a catch for all
Reply

#3
(07-04-2023, 12:12 AM)Metal Mickey Wrote: Not very well thought out just a catch for all

Absolutely it was brought in as a catch all, they made CA a scapegoat for it
Reply



Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
[-]
Quick Reply
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2023 Confidentialacces is Back.