Hey guys,

If you are just passing through here on the forum and read something of interest then please don't hesitate to jump in and give your thoughts.

That's how we will move along and get things lively and interesting.

From the Companies House website today. This is new news and relevant to anyone who forms companies so please read.

This is one of the most significant moments for Companies House in our long history.
 
I’m delighted that we can now play a much greater role in disrupting economic crime and preventing abuse of the register, while supporting economic growth and ease of doing business in the UK.
 
The measures set out in the act will give us new and enhanced powers to improve the quality and reliability of our data.
 
We’ll also be able to act more quickly if people tell us their personal information has been used on the register without their consent. This will make a real difference to individuals and it’s something I’m particularly passionate about.
 
The measures include:
 
introducing identity verification for all new and existing registered company directors, people with significant control, and those who file on behalf of companies
broadening my powers to become a more active gatekeeper over company creation and a custodian of more reliable data
improving the financial information on the register so that the register is more reliable and accurate, reflects the latest advancements in digital technology, and enables better business decisions
providing Companies House with more effective investigation and enforcement powers, and increasing our ability to share relevant information with partners
enhancing the protection of personal information to protect individuals from fraud and other harms.

New objectives for the Registrar of Companies
The act has introduced 4 new objectives for me as the Registrar of Companies. Alongside my colleagues, I’ll promote these objectives while carrying out my duties:
 
To ensure that anyone who is required to deliver a document to the registrar does so (and that the requirements for proper delivery are complied with).
To ensure information contained in the register is accurate and that the register contains everything it ought to contain.
To ensure that records kept by the registrar do not create a false or misleading impression to members of the public.
To prevent companies and others from carrying out unlawful activities, or facilitating others to carry out unlawful activities.
As an organisation, we’ll base our decisions on these objectives. Our new and enhanced powers will give us the tools we need to act on those decisions.

What happens next
Although the Bill has received royal assent and is now an act, you do not need to do anything differently just yet.
 
Some of the measures in the act, such as identity verification, will not be introduced straight away. Many of these changes need system development and This is new and important news so please read.

The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill has achieved royal assent and become law. This is one of the most significant moments for Companies House in our long history.

However, other measures will come into force sooner. Over time, they’ll lead to improved transparency and more accurate and trusted information on our registers.
 
These early measures include:
 
greater powers to query information. This means we’ll be able to scrutinise and reject information that seems incorrect or inconsistent with information already on the register. In some cases, we’ll be able to remove information.
stronger checks on company names
new rules for registered office addresses which will mean all companies must have an appropriate address at all times. Companies will not be able to use a PO Box as their registered office address.
a requirement for all companies to supply a registered email address
a requirement for all companies to confirm they’re forming the company for a lawful purpose when they incorporate. Every year, the company will need to confirm that its future activities will be lawful on their confirmation statement.
annotations on the register to let users know about potential issues with the information that’s been supplied to us
taking steps to clean up the register, using data matching to identify and remove inaccurate information
sharing data with other government departments and law enforcement agencies
We expect these measures to come into force in early 2024.
 
We will not be able to identify every piece of information or document on the register that could be incorrect or inconsistent. However, we’ll base all our decisions on my new objectives to make sure we’re making best use of our new and enhanced powers.

This isn't brand new news but it's something everyone should know about.

By
Sebastian Klovig Skelton, Senior reporter Computer Weekly
Published: 05 Oct 2023 12:15
Policing minister Chris Philp has outlined his intention to give police forces access to the UK’s passport database, claiming it will enhance their facial-recognition capabilities to help catch shoplifters and other criminals.
 
 
Speaking at a fringe event of the Conservative Party Conference, Philp told attendees that he plans to integrate data from the police national database (PND), the Passport Office and other national databases to help police find a match with the “click of one button”.
 
“I’m going to be asking police forces to search all of those databases – the police national database, which has custody images, but also other databases like the passport database – not just for shoplifting, but for crime generally, to get those matches, because the technology is now so good that you can get a blurred image and get a match for it,” he said.
 
“Operationally, I’m asking them to do it now. In the medium term, by which I mean the next two years, we’re going to try to create a new data platform so you can press one button [and it] lets you search it all in one go.”
 
Philp added that police forces should search each database separately until the new platform is up and running.
 
According to the 2021 census, just over 86% of the British public hold at least one passport.
 
In 2012, a High Court ruling specifically found the retention of custody images in the PND to be unlawful on the basis that information about unconvicted people was being treated in the same way as information about people who were ultimately convicted, and that the six-year retention period was disproportionate.
 
Speaking to Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) in February 2023, the biometric and surveillance camera commissioner for England and Wales, Fraser Sampson, said: “I’m here today saying there are probably several million of those records still,” adding that the response from policing bodies and the Home Office (which owns most of the biometric database used by UK police) is to point out the information is held on a database with no bulk deletion capability.
 
“I’m not sure that works for public trust and confidence, but even if it did … you can’t [legally] rely on a flaw in a database you built for unlawfully retaining stuff … that’s a technical problem that’s of the country’s and the police’s making rather than the people whose images you’ve kept.”
 
Read more about facial recognition technology
UK police double down on ‘improved’ facial recognition: The Met and South Wales Police have doubled down on their use of facial recognition technology after research found improved accuracy in their algorithms when using certain settings, but civil society groups maintain that the tech will still be used in a discriminatory fashion.
Home Office pushes for more police facial-recognition deployments: An independent report commissioned by the biometrics commissioner of England and Wales reveals that the UK policing minister is pushing for wider adoption of facial-recognition technology by police, and further criticises the government’s proposed changes to surveillance oversight.
Home Office and MoD seeking new facial-recognition tech: The UK’s Defence and Security Accelerator is running a ‘market exploration’ exercise on behalf of the Home Office to identify new facial-recognition capabilities for security and policing bodies in the UK.
Responding to questions from Computer Weekly about whether Philp’s comments were official policy or something he was saying in a personal capacity, a Home Office spokesperson said: “The government is committed to making sure the police have the tools and technology they need to solve and prevent crimes, bring offenders to justice and keep people safe.
 
“Technology such as facial recognition can help the police quickly and accurately identify those wanted for serious crimes, as well as missing or vulnerable people,” they said. “It also frees up police time and resources, meaning more officers can be out on the beat, engaging with communities and carrying out complex investigations.
 
“We are working with policing to enable seamless searching of relevant images where it is necessary and proportionate for them to do so to investigate crime and protect the public.”
 
In response to Philp’s comments, Sampson told the BBC it’s important for police to avoid giving people the impression they’re on a “digital lineup”.
 
“The state has large collections of good-quality photographs of a significant proportion of the population – drivers and passport holders being good examples – which were originally required and given as a condition of, say, driving and international travel,” he said.
 
“If the state routinely runs every photograph against every picture of every suspected incident of crime simply because it can, there is a significant risk of disproportionality and of damaging public trust.”
 
Speaking with Computer Weekly, he added that one significant risk from large, state-operated databases lies in the aggregated effect of having pulled so much information into one place.
 
“Once you add information from all government databases, such as driver and vehicle licensing, and Automatic Number Plate Recognition logging vehicle registration numbers and movements, you have a hugely intrusive and sprawling visibility of citizens the vast majority of whom are beyond any reasonable suspicion,” he said. “If anyone still believes the adage that ‘if you’ve done nothing wrong you’ve nothing to worry about’, they have completely misunderstood the issue.”
 
Further responses
Silkie Carlo, director of Big Brother Watch, described Philp’s plans as an “Orwellian nightmare”, noting that it would be a “gross violation” of UK privacy rights. “It means that over 45 million of us with passports who gave our images for travel purposes will, without any kind of consent or the ability to object, be part of secret police lineups,” she said.
 
“To scan the population’s photos with highly inaccurate facial-recognition technology and treat us like suspects is an outrageous assault on our privacy that totally overlooks the real reasons for shoplifting. Philp should concentrate on fixing broken policing rather than building an automated surveillance state.”
 
Emmanuelle Andrews, policy and campaigns manager at the campaign group, added: “Time and time again, the government has relied on the social issue of the day to push through increasingly authoritarian measures. And that’s just what we’re seeing here with these extremely worrying proposals to encourage the police to scan our faces as we go to buy a pint of milk and trawl through our personal information.
 
“By enabling the police to use private dashcam footage, as well as the immigration and asylum system, and passport database, the government are turning our neighbours, loved ones, and public service officials into border guards and watchmen.”
 
Karen Yeung, an interdisciplinary professorial fellow in law, ethics and informatics at Birmingham Law School, also questioned the necessity and proportionality of the measure.
 
“Providing police with routine access to Britain’s passport database to automatically identify those whose images were captured by CCTV as suspected shoplifters, burglars or other kinds of crime, seriously interferes with rights to privacy and data protection,” she said. “These interferences would not meet the tests of necessity and proportionality in a democratic society.”
 
“This proposal not only reflects a naïve technological solutionism in which digital technologies will readily solve deep-seated social problems, it also displays a reckless disregard for the basic liberties and freedoms of British citizens,” said Yeung.
 
“It could be taken straight from the playbook of authoritarian states, standing in stark contrast to the calls from over 155 organisations, led by Amnesty, urging the EU to impose a full ban on the use of facial-recognition systems in publicly accessible places under its proposed [artificial intelligence] AI Act.”
 
Urgent need for biometric regulation
Michael Birtwistle, associate director of law and policy at the Ada Lovelace Institute, said the accuracy, scientific basis and legality of facial recognition technologies are still highly contested, and outlined the need for specific legal framework to govern the use of biometrics in the UK. 
 
“The Ada Lovelace Institute commissioned Matthew Ryder KC to review the legal governance of biometric technologies, which found that the current legal framework is not fit for purpose, due to a fragmented and confusing patchwork of laws,” he said.
 
“Parliamentary Select Committees, the Biometrics Commissioner and other experts all agree on the need to establish proper governance mechanisms before these technologies can be used,” said Birtwistle. “The 2019 Conservative Party manifesto acknowledged these concerns, promising that police technologies would be used safely ‘within a strict legal framework’.
 
“To expand the deployment of facial recognition to a database containing images of 45 million members of the British public, without their consent and without the existence of such a framework, would risk creating unprecedented public backlash, setting back trust in public sector use of data and AI.”
 
In a report that was sent to the Home Office in November 2022 and published on February 2023, Sampson previously called for clear, comprehensive and coherent frameworks to regulate police use of AI and biometrics in the UK, noting that there has been an “explosion of capability in AI-driven biometric surveillance”.
 
Both Parliament and civil society have also repeatedly called for new legal frameworks to govern law enforcement’s use of biometrics – including a House of Lords inquiry into police use of advanced algorithmic technologies; the UK’s Equalities and Human Rights Commission; the former biometrics commissioner Paul Wiles; and the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, which called for a moratorium on live facial recognition as far back as July 2019.
 
However, the government maintains that there is “already a comprehensive framework” in place.

Quote:CA SAYS: Fantastic thats what people power does!

driving while intoxicated laws on Ohio may be complicated, then again it's vital to acquire a solid comprehension of themselves if your are facing complaints. Operating under that influence of alcohol (DUI) is truly a serious misdemeanor who can feature notable consequences on personal life. In Ohio, the actual lawful threshold for body ethanol concentration (BAC) is eight percentfor nearly all motorists plus 4 percent commercial truckers.

If you might be pulled over by police police and suspected of drunk driving, they might do field temperance studies or substance reports, this type of that breathalyzer or circulation challenges, to establish any level of damage. Refusing these tests can cause instant sanctions, including license suspension.

dwi crimes in Ohio maintain various consequences, counting on variables want last convictions, BAC levels, then regardless of whether recently there was ever an incident or hurt concerned. Issues can add in fines, license suspension system, imperative alcoholic beverage process applications, probation, and uniform imprison time. Repeat offenses and aggravated circumstances can result in more dreadful penalties.

Suffering from a skilled DUI barrier attorney is vital to navigate the difficulties of Ohio drunk driving statutes. They might analyze the verification, confront the lawfulness of the cure, challenge the quality of checks, and examine capacity defense to help minimize the rates. On top of that, an legal can guide you by the authorized process, making sure their correct are protected and touting for the greatest a possibility finish.

Keep in mind, being told in regards to Ohio's DUI regulations and in search of the help of an seasoned lawyers are important steps in successfully taking care of a DUI appoint additionally safeguarding some forthcoming. juvenile crimes attorney

Drunk driving is a significant crime and that can result in dangerous punishment, such as jailhouse time, fines, then a criminal history. In the event that you or a family member has been faced with drunk driving, it is vital to take finding a criminal DUI legal professional. In this specific article, we are going to discuss the benefits of using a criminal DUI attorney in court.

Legal Expertise: DUI law firms are knowledgeable when you look at the legal areas of drunk driving cases. They could navigate the complex legal system and also have a deeper knowledge of the law and courtroom processes. This knowledge can be invaluable in making certain your legal rights are protected and therefore you will get the perfect outcome.

Negotiating Plea Deals: OVI legal professionals have the knowledge and negotiation skills to negotiate plea deals on your behalf. They could negotiate with prosecutors to reduce the charges against you or even secure a far more lenient sentence. This will help you save time, money, and stress.

Evidence Review: DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE attorney at law can review the data against you to definitely see whether it absolutely was obtained legally. In the event that data was obtained illegally, it may be excluded from legal proceedings proceedings, that could immensely improve your likelihood of a great outcome.

Cross-Examine Witnesses: lawyers are skilled in cross-examination, which will help to discredit the testimony of witnesses against you. This could weaken the prosecution's case while increasing the probability of a positive outcome.

Sentencing Alternatives: DUI attorneys can negotiate for alternative sentences, such as for instance community service or substance abuse programs, instead of jail time. This may provide a far more good result for your needs and can assist you to prevent the stigma of experiencing a criminal track.

Court Experience: DUI attorneys have extensive expertise in court and generally are knowledgeable about court procedures and protocols. They learn how to fight successfully for you and will supply a good protection. This might boost your likelihood of a great end.

Representation in Hearings: DUI law firms can portray you in administrator proceedings, such as for example license suspension proceedings, which will help to preserve your driving privileges. This could easily stop you from losing your license and may ensure it is simpler for you to get to work, school, as well as other needed places.

Protection of Constitutional Rights: DUI attorneys make sure that your constitutional rights are protected through the court process. This consists of the ability to a good trial, the right to remain silent, together with straight to get rid unreasonable searches and seizures.

In summary, selecting a criminal DUI attorney at law can offer plenty of pros in legal proceedings. From legal expertise and negotiating due process deals to defending your constitutional rights, legal counsel can offer a strong defense while increasing your odds of a favorable outcome in drunk driving case. If you or a family member has been faced with driving under the influence, it is vital to consider hiring a criminal DUI attorney to ensure your liberties are protected and that you will get the best possible result.

If you wish to know more about the item subject matter come to some web address: plea bargain lawyer

OVI statutes around Ohio might be complex, however it's important to come with a solid comprehension of one if a person find expenditures. Driving under each influence (DUI) is actually a serious law-breaking this can offer notable consequences on their life. In Ohio, all lawful limit for circulation ethanol content (BAC) is 8 percentfor the majority motorists so four percent business vehicle operators.

If you may be pulled by legal police and suspected of drunk driving, they may undertake roadside sobriety reports or chemical assessments, these being breathalyser or body assessments, to establish a level of disability. Declining these kinds of tests can result in automatic sanctions, including driving license suspension.

ovi criminal acts in Ohio maintain different penalties, depending upon on variables like prior prosecutions, BAC amount, as well as whether online was basically an auto accident or personal injury engaging. Outcomes can comprise fees, license suspension system, necessary alcoholic therapy products, liberation, and uniform imprisonment time. Reiterate crimes and provoked cases can lead to more terrible penalties.

Receiving a experienced DUI shield attorney is vital to navigate the difficulties of Ohio ovi laws. They may examine the proof of, struggle the legalization of the limit, inquire the accurate of examinations, and browse prospective safeguarding to help decrease the accusations. Furthermore, an legal practitioner can tips you during the authentic process, making sure that your very own right are secured and pushing for the perfect feasible result.

Keep in mind, being instructed more than Ohio's DUI laws and finding the support of an encountered attorneys are vital actions in well control a DUI appoint and shielding a long-term. rape defense lawyer

Quote:CA Says: No Wonder they wanted us gone all those years ago, our bank statements were the best then and still are now

Quote:CA Says: If the Dyfed-Powys Police can mistake an ex fraud offender for a sex case and send sex offender managers to his home to make inspections then what chance do we have. You Know DC855 Danielle Evans who we are talking about!!! Your Police Force is a fucking disgrace!